Titus 1:1-7

Last night began facilitating a Bible study in the book of Titus using the English Standard Version, or ESV. ATMt the request of a long time friend and reader I will give some details of the study. Bear in mind that some of my perspectives are not mainstream although I believe them to be supported by Scripture. Titus is mentioned about a dozen other times in the NT, primarily in 2 Corinthians. As is his invariable practice, Paul refers to himself as an apostle, one of the ascension gifts given by the Lord Jesus. Cf Ephesians 4:7-11. We never see in Scripture the wording "the apostle Paul" which would indicate a title rather than a gift. If. Matthew 23:8-11 where 3 times Jesus shows us not to have titles. I believe only the Lord Jesus Christ should have a title. Verse 4, which refers to Titus as "my true child, (some versions say son) indicates the depth of their relationship. (also illustrated in 2 Corinthians 2:12-13). In fact, of all Paul's coworkers and companions, only Timothy and Titus are referred to us (spiritual) sons. verse 5 To put things in God's order it is necessary for Titus to appoint elders (plural) On this and 15 other references, e.g. Acts 14:23 I submit that church government is horizontal humanly speaking, with a plurality of Biblically qualified elders, none of whom is above the others. This view is in direct opposition to the vertical approach used in almost all American congregations. I don't expect my understanding to be accepted although I have experienced it working quite well in some churches in Brazil. verse 6, above reproach means no legitimate accusation can be lodged. husband of one wife. I am aware of at least six different interpretations of this verse. Take your pick. Children are believers, not guilty of debauchery or insubordination shows that a man with younger children should not be an elder. The primary qualification is godly character which sums up the specific requirements.