GOD'S ORDER
The following
is intended to reflect my current understanding of God's order rather
than a polished essay. God's order is reflected in His creation:
gravity, day and night, the reality that the sexual union of two
horses does not produce a frog but a colt. It is also reflected in
God Himself: we see Jesus and the Holy Spirit praying to God the
Father (Romans 8:28, 34). We don't read of the Father praying to the
Son or the Spirit. His order is also to be yielded to in His kingdom.
Those angels who disobeyed are “kept in eternal chains under gloomy
darkness until the judgment of the great day.” (Jude 6 ESV) And
the Church is to submit to God's order also.
When one
examines the epistles of Paul the apostle one finds that, excluding
Hebrews as of uncertain authorship, one-third of his writings,
twenty-nine of eighty-seven chapters, are written to the Corinthians.
One reason for this is the unwillingness of the Corinthians to submit
to God's order. Four times in 1 Corinthians, ( 4:17, 7:17, 11:16,
14:33) Paul states that what he is writing to them is his rule in all
the churches. In 7:35 he says he writes to promote “good order.”
At the end of a long discussion about tongues and prophecy in chapter
14 he writes, “Let all thing be done decently and in order.”
Finally in Titus 1 Paul says explicitly that he has left Titus in
Crete to “put what remained into order, and to appoint elders in
every town...” (Titus 1:5 ESV) This shows that not having elders
meant that the believers in Crete were out of God's order even as the
believers in Corinth although for different reasons. So we have Paul
in his apostolic role directing Titus to appoint elders who would in
turn shepherd local congregations.
For many years
I have advocated and taught something I referred to as “elder
guided consensus.” After a lengthy time of study, prayer,
discussion etc. with other believers we attempted to put this into
practice. At the same time I continued to to read and study. We were
hoping to avoid some of the abuses and problems that we had
experienced in prior settings. I now believe that we were still
missing some ingredients of the “cake.”
In God's order
we see the Father as the supreme “Head.” ( 1 Cor. 11:3) Jesus
submits to Him. (Cf. 1 Cor. 15:24-28) Jesus receives all authority
from the Father (Matthew 28:18) and delegates some of this to the
original apostolic company to establish the church. (Matt. 28:19-20,
Acts 1:2) The apostles direct the affairs of the church. It is
instructive to see how this is done. In Acts 1 the question arises of
who should replace Judas as an apostle. Beginning in verse 15 Peter
identifies the problem, references the Psalms in verse 20 and gives
the solution which the church acts upon. The church of about one
hundred and twenty is involved but Peter directs the process.
Similarly in
Acts 6 when the problem regarding preferential treatment of the
Hebrew widows arises, the twelve apostles summon the disciples, give
the solution, and allow the disciples to choose the seven men
indicated. Then the apostles lay hands on and pray for them. The
church is involved but the apostles give direction and control the
process. The apostles do not want to neglect their study of the Word.
( V. 6)
In Acts 15 the
issue is one of salvation. (Verse 1) Paul and Barnabas, both
apostles, and others go to Jerusalem to resolve this question. The
church welcomes them but it is the apostles and the elders who gather
together to discuss the matter. (V. 6) There is much debate. Peter,
Paul, Barnabas and James, all apostles, are mentioned as speaking.
James references the Scriptures (Amos 9:11-12) in his speech. Verse
twenty-two says it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with
the whole church to choose men to send back with Paul and Barnabas.
The church is involved but the apostles and elders are pre-eminent,
and the Scripture is the foundation for the decision as in the
previous examples.
Herein lies one
of the primary difficulties with “pure” consensus. It makes it
far easier for things to be done without any Biblical basis. True
elders are to be “able to teach,” (1 Tim. 3:2) and “holding
firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to
give instruction in sound doctrine and able also to rebuke those who
contradict it.” (Titus 1:9) While everyone should be a workman who
does not need to be ashamed (2 Tim. 2:15) that is often not the case.
The examples from the book of Acts rely on apostolic direction and
the Word of God rather than just a culturally acceptable view that
the opinion of each individual is just as valuable as the next
person's.
Many Christians
today believe that there were apostles in the first century New
Testament era but none since. The primary argument is that it was
through the apostolic company that the NT came, with which view I
concur. Since the canon of Scripture is complete there can be no more
apostles or prophets. I agree that there can be none of the same
order as the NT company yet I find a basis for a secondary group, who
cannot add to Scriptural revelation, in Ephesians 4. Starting in
verse 12 we find things that are to be done by certain gifted
people- equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, building up
of the body of Christ... “until” we all attain to the unity of
the faith, to mature manhood, to the fullness of Christ... Have all
these things happened yet? I think not. Who is to do them? Verse 11
says apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers. We still
believe that there are evangelists, pastors and teachers. How can we
chop the verse in half and say there are no more apostles or
prophets?
When I consider
my past thirteen years in the house church movement, one of the
greatest problems is that of isolation and inward focus. Each little
independent group is relying primarily on one or two leaders to
provide all the spiritual direction, teaching etc. needed for the
group. I submit that we have set up our own little principalities and
gotten out of God's order. In our zeal to have independence we have
forsaken the input of the itinerant Ephesians 4:11 gifts, and in many
cases either not established or nullified the authority of elders. As
in the days of the NT we need apostolic direction and covering.
As I have been
requested to write a little on the theme of “covering,” let me
attempt to explain this. In Matthew 28 Jesus gives what has become
known as the “Great Commission,” to make disciples. The
underlying Greek word for disciple, mathetes,” means one who is a
learner, which requires humility. If I am a learner it implies that
someone is teaching me. I call that person a disciple-maker. I need
to yield to that person's greater understanding and experience in
order to grow. Do I learn everything I need to know in a few short
months or even years? I don't think so.
Am I truly
objective about my spiritual condition? I have run into Christians
who say that they submit to Jesus only. Only the Holy Spirit tells
them what to do. Based on the discussion on God's order above I
question this assertion. As I have made it in the past, I believe it
to be spiritual pride. I don't need anyone to tell me anything. The
truth is that I do. Consider Hebrews 3:13. “Exhort one another
every day as long as it is called today, that none of you may be
hardened by the deceitfulness of sin.” “Aha, Rick, did you see
that phrase, “one another?” That nullifies your point. I have
copied out the fifty or more “one another” verses in the NT,
taught on them, and attempt to practice them. I practice this with
the brother whom the Lord has directed me to submit too.
Why do I submit
to him? Because of the fruit I see in his life. I desire that fruit
in my own life. While realizing that our gifting is different, ( 1
Cor. 12:11) I believe that there is much that God can offer me
through him. I also believe that we accomplish far more if we work
together in a coherent way than if each one tries to do his own
thing. Take the example of a coach with a sports team. The individual
players can play the game more skillfully than the coach. Yet they
need his direction, ability to blend their gifts and talents
together, and the vision that he sets for the team. The apostolic
gifting is similar.
So the theme of
covering reflects the individual disciple's relationship with someone
whom he respects in the Lord, who provides direction and exhortation
and even reproof and rebuke if necessary, someone who cares for him.
In summary I
believe the Bible teaches God's order, which is reflected in
individual discipleship, who then coalesce into churches directed by
elders and overseen by apostles who work as a team with the other
Ephesians 4:11 gifts.
No comments:
Post a Comment